Section I. Why is Requirements Development So Hard?

Of all project activities, requirements development has changed the least in approach and results. Its importance is recognized, so why aren't we doing better? This section describes the nature of the challenge.

• Challenge of communication
• Why review and analysis dont fit find most defects
• Role of human factors
• Why requirements are dangerous

Section II. Types of Requirements Risk

There are many things that impact the quality of requirements and many things that requirements can affect. We factor requirements risk into seven groups and describe the contents of each.

• Application risk
• Stakeholder risk
• Process risk
• Resource risk
• Change risk
• Implementation risk
• Defect risk

EXERCISE: Participants identify their requirements risks. Then, teams share their risks with the entire group.

Section III. Requirements Risk Management

After admitting the danger, a project team must control its requirements risk. This section describes the challenges of a risk management process.

• Recognizing requirements risk
• Forecasting project-specific dangers
• Developing a strategy
• Monitoring reality

Section IV. Safety Tactics 1: Avoiding Requirements-based Failures

Projects become famous failures by promising a lot, consuming resources, and delivering little or nothing. Tactics in this section focus on avoiding this type of fame.

• Reconfirm reality and satisfiability of stated needs
• Triage and prioritize requirements
• Manage customer expectations
• Reconfirm project feasibility or reduce scope
• Identify and resolve conflicts early
• Commit incrementally

EXERCISE: The entire group identifies challenges of incremental commitment  why might it be hard?

Section V. Safety Tactics 2: Mitigating Impact of Requirements-based Problems

Requirements will conflict and be defective, despite your best efforts. This section describes tactics that reduce the impact of these problems.

• Require frequent demos of understanding
• Decouple vision from build
• Prototype unfamiliar functions and interfaces
• Subdivide project scope
• Build in multilane cycles

Section VI. Safety Tactics 3a: Minimizing Communication Problems

Clear project communication is one of the core challenges of system development. Natural language is a major problem, because it is so natural. This section describes alternatives and supplements to text blocks.

• Maintain a climate of safety and respect
• Document assumptions
• Mark intentional imprecision
• Use rich definitions
• Use derived values rather than "magic numbers"
• Identify user types and create user personas
• Clarify with examples and measures
• Structure information with spec patterns
• Picture requirements information
• Capture context

EXERCISE: Teams create rich definitions including a derived value, quality profile, and action contract. Team definitions are shared with the entire group.

EXERCISE: Teams replace a "magic number" with a derived value.

EXERCISE: Teams create a state transition table and then share with the entire group.

Section VII. Safety Tactics 3b: Minimizing Other Problems

Beyond communication, there are other problems that can be reduced with specific minimization tactics. This section describes these added tactics.

• Improve results of current requirements development process
• Identify minimal sets of marketable features
• Focus on quality and environmental requirements early
• Identify impacts and mitigation strategies
• Analyze benefits, risks, priority, and cost of proposed requirements and changes

Section VIII. Safety Tactics 4: Monitoring Requirements Status

Requirements and their related information (e.g. defects) must be monitored to detect expected and unexpected risk. This section describes tactics that provide this monitoring.

• Monitor requirements instability and growth
• Monitor accuracy of assumptions, expectations, and priorities
• Monitor stakeholder participation
• Use workshops to find issues early
• Incrementally review long specifications
• Identify unclear, imprecise, and missing information
• Estimate defect risk
• Verify satisfaction arguments of derived requirements
• Track requirements defects
• Analyze and classify requirements defects and root causes

EXERCISE: The entire group interprets requirements change measures.

Section IX. Safety Tactics 5: Staffing for Requirements Development

People, their involvement, knowledge, and behavior make all the difference. This section focuses on getting the right people, with the right perspective and skills to do the job right.

• Build cross-functional team
• Supplement with outside knowledge, skill, and experience
• Replace underperformers and disruptors
• Train stakeholders in technical communication
• Immerse stakeholders

Section X. Safety Tactics 6: Planning for Requirements Risk Management

To get risk management off to a solid start, you need to understand what information people need and what bad things might happen as you try to get it. This section deals with creating effective strategies for requirements development and risk management.

• Elicit meta-requirements
• Brainstorm risks and tactics
• Identify risk indicators and root causes
• Customize requirements development and specification strategy
• Customize, carry out, and monitor requirements risk management strategy

EXERCISE: Teams brainstorm risks and tactics for a case study and then share results with the entire group.

Section XI. Safety Tactics 7: Preparing for Requirements Risk Management

Some tactics (e.g. acquiring tools) involve the creation, outside a production project, of a foundation that enables other safety tactics (e.g. identify imprecise information) to be more effective during development. This section describes these foundational tactics.

• Formulate baseline requirements process(es)
• Systematize change management and requirements defect and failure tracking
• Provide tools supporting safer requirements
• Develop requirements defect and root cause profiles
• Conduct requirements retrospectives

Section XII. Safety Tactics 8: Compensating for Requirements-based Problems

Because misunderstanding will occur and mistakes will be made, some design, implementation, and test work will need to be redone. Sometimes your worst fears will not be realized and your strategy will need adjusting.

• Estimate and track requirements-based rework
• Adjust for surprises, both good and bad

EXERCISE: Teams walk through the tactics usage process